Call to Action #61



61. We call upon church parties to the Settlement Agreement, in collaboration with Survivors and representatives of Aboriginal organizations, to establish permanent funding to Aboriginal people for:


       i. Community-controlled healing and reconciliation projects.

     ii. Community-controlled culture- and language revitalization projects.

     iii. Community-controlled education and relationship building projects.

     iv. Regional dialogues for Indigenous spiritual leaders and youth to discuss       Indigenous spirituality, self-determination, and reconciliation.



In a few words: Churches should provide funding for Indigenous healing projects


What does this mean in simple English?



Given that this recommendation comes with a lot of financial cost attached, this recommendation might at first seem a little demanding towards religious groups. One might ask why it should be religious groups, and not the government who funds these programs. Is it unreasonable that churches should pay for these healing programs? Based on the fact many churches spent significant amounts of money administering residential schools—programs which severely damaged many Indigenous individuals—it is not unreasonable to think it would be right for churches to provide money to work towards healing for individuals and communities affected by residential schools.


 Again, from a policy perspective, a response such as this will be very hard to implement across the board, but will be the responsibility of each individual religious group. Individual people can help make a difference, if applicable, by calling upon their own individual religious groups to pay attention to this recommendation.


Further Reading:



Compiled by Jonathan Wearing


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *